Snell Acoustics E-5 Floorstanding Speakers
Snell Acoustics E-5 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 31, 2021]
AndreMartin
Strength:
I am also using the E.5's mated w/ the PS10 sub.True, these are considered entry level floor standing speakers, but I'm hooked. So great to enjoy this unit after a emondage job. The E5's perform wonderfully in my environment (approx. 15x20 w/ cathedral ceiling). I auditioned many speakers before selecting the Snells including B&W,Energy,Theil and Van's. I listen to everything from 311 to L'estro Armonico and sometimes Xtremly loud. These speakers have never let me down. I beleive for the money, not only the speakers but the combo also would be a wise consideration for most any listener....AudioEgoPhiles excluded. Weakness:
I don't see any yet. Purchased: Used
|
[May 22, 2020]
karister99
Strength:
I've acquired these monitors some time back, and they've been idling for couple of years now. When I first got them, didn't think that they sound anything close to my Energy Veritas 2.2i, and fast forward to my current system, well these are some amazing very detailed speakers can hang with my Veritas, no sweat. I think this lockdown situation has got me tinkering with my stuff and manage to discover these stunning configuration. I'm mating them with my Arcam avr 300 as the preamp, and four Sonance 275SE amp's in bridge mode, where they pump 250watts in 8ohm loads. With this configuration two separate amps powering each speaker biamped. I really love the sound these little gems radiate in my listing area, the sound stage is vast very clear and precise. These are very well constructed amazing and stunning speakers, if one is looking for a great pair of book shelf speakers, this is it. I'm ecstatic! Weakness:
Only, negative to mention is lacking of the bottom end, not of a issue as we're using subs. Make sure to drive them with enough power as they are some power hungry @ 86 or 89db, other than that, these are one of the top shelf speakers. Price Paid: 500
Purchased: Used
|
[Dec 24, 2009]
bradpmiller
Audio Enthusiast
I am quite impressed. My first experience with Snell speakers. I ran comparison tests against some other speakers I own (Dahlquist DQ-10, Magnapan's Model 2, Vandersteen 2 & 2Ce, Acoustat II, Crown ES212, Carver ASL III, Infinity Reference II, and some custom speakers I've built). We played around with several placement configurations and a mixture of audio components (Sansui, Carver, Luxman, Akai, SEA, Soundcraftsman, and Setton). All speakers have a sound somewhat unique to their respective design and don't handle all classes of music equally. That being said, I found the Snell E.5's had a very nice soundstage and overall image quality. While not well suited for heavy rock due to deep bass limitations, the rest of the spectrum response is quite pleasant to the ear. I would not use these in a A/V application, but certainly recommend them for a 'stereo room'. Given my acquisition price, I paid $200 on the Bay, they can't be beat. I would recommend removing the mid/woofers and filling the magnetic shield with a dampening agent. They can resonate. I used a noncorrosive silicone compound. After that, play away.....Regards |
[Mar 15, 2003]
Bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Bass. Soundstage. Presence. I have had the Snell E.5 mk2 for several months now and am very pleased. I am using them for the front speakers in my home theater with K.5 mk2 for surrounds and Cr.5 mk2 for the center. These speakers throw a very wide soundstage and the bass is excellent with clear attacks. The dynamic range of these speakers is excellent. Midrange and highs are also handled quite well. Very flexible with their placement options due to the switches on the back. In the past several years I have had several other floorstanding speakers and I prefer the Snells. Much better bass response than B&W CDM-7se with a better soundstage. The B&W are a little too overdamped for my tastes. I have also had the Martin Logan Scenarios. No, the Snells Are not as quick(but close) or as clear in the midrange but I always felt there was something lacking in the ML. I would call it presence. Just a little too light. I have very good equipment(Aragon amps and B&K processor) so I can't blame it on upstream components. A killer value for the money. Similar Products Used: B&W CDM7-SE. Martin Logan Scenario. |
[Jan 08, 2003]
psyopwak
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Soundstage CLARITY Smooth midrange (female vocals are beautiful) Tremendous bass Delicacy , seperation of sounds
Weakness:
NEEDPOWER- 4ohm type speakers NEED- great pre-pro Well I have posted a review on this speaker about three years ago. This is a follow up. This is the best damned set of speakers I have owned. I have recently UPGRADED to a DENON receiver with a PARASOUND amp driving the SNELL E-5's. The sound is astonishing! A couple of things I've learned I will pass on- 1 E-5's NEED alot of power. If they have it, they will sound exquisite. If they do not, they will sound good. If you are using a "cheapy" receiver, it may shut down. 2 E-5's need to be moved around to get the optimal placement. The rear firing tweeter will give great spatial effect and soundstage if the speaker is placed away from the wall and toed in JUST RIGHT. To sum up, at the price range I've heard JBL's Polk's, BOSE, Paradigm (I also like and own MONITOR 9's), PSB's, Klipsch's, Theil's and a few others. The E-5's sound the best IMHO. Similar Products Used: JBL L150 BOSE 901 Paradigm MON 9 Klipsch R?? |
[Feb 12, 2002]
Umrswimr
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Nice wide soundstage and smooth detail throughout the midrange. Inexpensive, yet extremely competative with more expensive speakers from Paradigm.
Weakness:
Inefficient (they''re nominal 4 Ohms) with 89dB sensitivity. SET folks need not apply (though I''m sure you knew that). They''re uninvolving with larger rooms unless you crank the volume- at which point the treble starts to get fatiguing in a hurry. Lack of low-end ooomph will require a sub for HT duty, though 2-channel can go both ways, dependig on your music choices, rooms size, and bass desires. 2-channel only is run sans sub in my room. I bought these speakers back when I was in college as an upgrade from some cheap Sony towers. The other speakers in the running were the Paradigm Ref 60-100''s and B&W 600 series. Compared to the Paradigms 80 and 100, the Snell''s lacked bass response and low-end authority. The 80''s, IMHO, were just plain bad. The 100''s were MUCH better, but lacked the wide soundstage and upper-end detail that the Snell''s provided. The Snell''s had an "air" about them that was simply awe-inspiring. The B&W''s never really drew me in... I always felt left out- liek the speakers were putting up a wall between myself and the music. With an exception of the Phenominal 801''s, I haven''t been fond of any B&W speakers. I took the E.5''s home and was quite impressed with them through my Carver A500 amp, Lexicon DC-1 pre, Rega Planet, and Tara cables. The room was quite small (perhaps 12x14) and the speakers simply buried you in detail. They were awesome. However, once I got my Atma-Sphere MA-1''s (~85WPC tubed monoblocks), I strated to notice two things: first- these speakers have great difficulty giving a "solid" soundstage. Ie, it''s hard to pinpoint a specific instrument or voice amonst a group. They all tend to "blend" together. This is especially true with classical works. They lack the ability to pinpoint the instuments accuratly. Second- they are now entirely unable to enthrall me in a movie. Perhaps it''s the larger room they''re in now (14x21x10) or the tubes, but I can''t get really into a movie anymore. My roommate''s DCM''s provide much more "slam" and enjoyment for movies. Switching back to my Carver''s (250 WPC into 8 Ohms) failed to cure the problem. I think these speakers are simply outmatched with a room this large. |
[Mar 28, 2000]
Jon
Strength:
Realistic vocals. The E.5 towers are incredible speakers at a very fair price. I compared B&W, Boston Acoustics, Acoustic Research, Klipsh and a couple of other (higher priced than Snell) brands. The E.5 speakers sounded the most 'realistic' (no, not Radio Shack!!!) to me. I have performed and attended hundreds of live performances and the vocals on the E.5 are smooth, accurate and have great presence. I'm powering them with a Nakamichi AV-10 at 100 Watts per channel and have never clipped. I have an Acoustic Research center channel which will be replaced by a Snell eventually. I use a powered Velodyne 10" sub since I prefer an abundance of bass with some rock music and some movies (like The Mummy). I like the other guy's comment that 'the purists' won't approve of the switches in the back. Well, if they bother them that much, they can get a soldering iron and bypass them. It's not that hard. I have owned perhaps 15 pair of speakers in 20 years. I was always looking for the right sound. Well, I've found it with the Snell E.5 tower speaker system. |
[Dec 14, 1999]
jon
Audio Enthusiast
i just spent 5 days and nights picking out the perfect home theatre system to entertain my new sony es 555 receiver. the snells were a fantastic surprise for the money. i purchased the e.5 towers,cr.5 center,sr.5 rears and an amazing M&K dual firing 12 inch per subwofffffer. my neighbors hate us to say the least. i would recommend my set up to anyone serious about growing with their music.... |
[Nov 22, 1999]
Bz
Audiophile
Strength:
Smooth response, liquid midrange
Weakness:
Bass extension Current system used in: Nakamichi AV-7 A/V receiver (great bargain receiver), Kimber Kable 8TC bi-wired, Sony DVP-S7700, Velodyne 10" sub, Snell C.5 center, Snell surrounds. Similar Products Used: Thiel 2 2 |
[Mar 01, 1998]
Paul
an Audio Enthusiast
Listened to several different speaker brands; B&W, Paradigm, NHT, Mirage, Polk,KEF, Klipsch and a couple others and the best I heard were the SNELL E-5s for |